|
right of revocation imprint horses + riding catalogue fishing + angling animals, hunting & environment Joseph Georg Wintter The Rugendas Family 45 years fine arts & rare books catalogues
Manuscripts
cartographyBibliophily Old Masters Drawings Prints XXth Century Law / Proclamations Views + Local History Miscellania: Books + Prints William Hogarth The AHA! event July 2008 Index of Artists homepage e-mail
privacy terms & conditions |
“ In the center (is)the Representation of the Individual Riding Lessonintent on Outmost Exactness ”( Dietrich Fröba )Eisenberg, Baron von. Le Dificile. In stretched leap to the left. Engraving by Bernard Picart (Paris 1673 – Amsterdam 1733/34). (1727.) Inscribed: XLVIII., otherwise as above. 22.2 x 30.3 cm.
Plate 48 of Eisenberg’s “Description du Manége Moderne” published first in 1727. – On fine laid paper with white margins above + below 1.3-1.6, laterally 2.1 and 3.1 cm resp. wide. – At the back isolated feeble foxspots barely perceptible from the front. Only far right at the edge of the subject three smaller and in the white margin one slightly larger spot noticeable. Irrespective of this dynamic sujet of fine freshness. Eisenberg , his activity as equerry in London in 1728, later in the Low Countries, in Vienna, and finally in Pisa in 1753 aside unknown in his living circumstances, became immortal by his comprehensive riding school, however, published first in 1727, much requested through the centuries and therefore re-issued again and again, in whose “center … the image (stands), the representation of the individual riding lessons intent on utmost exactness … The text is limited to short explanations” (Dietrich Fröba in the 1993 exhibition catalog “Horse and Rider in Five Centuries – Treasures from the Library of the German Horse Museum” on a French edition of 1733, no. 11). Brilliant in their thorough concentration on the lesson as the single essential for the expert the representations in their sparseness wanting in accessories are not without artistic model though, reminding of not that much dating back works by, e. g., Potter, Berchem, or Romeyn, recognized as modern and enthusing just for that. Considered comprehensively Eisenberg’s plates therefore could well be seen as standing in the aftermath of the Netherlandish art of the 17th century. Picart , the “most important and together most productive engraver in the French-Flemish region at the beginning of the 18th century” (Fröba, op. cit. p. 28), lived in Amsterdam since about 1710 where he also got married in 1719. Furthermore he might have been a grandchild of that Parisian flower painter and dealer Jean Michel Picart, whom Gerson, Spreading and Aftermath of Netherlandish Painting of the 17th Century, pp. 57 + 59, mentions as port of call for the Netherlanders pressing onto the market there, and with whom especially Willem Kalf was well acquainted with. Present Bernard Picart, however, “established his fame (in Amsterdam), both by the works he presented and a flourishing school in which he trained many artists” (Nagler).
(Museum S. B., 23. Februar 2004) |